Trust And Safety Mission

Mission

Parliament People helps people understand Parliament through source-grounded, attributable, reviewable civic information while reducing risks of misleading framing, missing context, incorrect attribution, unsafe publication, and unresolved public complaints.

What This Means

• Parliamentary source material remains authoritative.
• Parliament People explanations are product summaries, not official records.
• AI-assisted text must stay close to source material and visible provenance.
• Editorial choices, curation, labels, and ranking need review paths.
• Users and affected people need a clear way to report concerns and request corrections.
• Material corrections, policy updates, source issues, and system changes should be considered for public transparency logging.

What This Does Not Claim

Parliament People does not claim official parliamentary status, perfect neutrality, error-free AI output, or that summaries are a substitute for the source record.

Current Product Assumption

The current public product is mainly a reader, explainer, and reporting surface. Before comments, debate threads, opinion posts, annotations, reactions that affect ranking, sharing, personalised feeds, or other user-to-user features launch, the team must run a fresh trust and safety assessment.

Regulatory Awareness

UK online-safety expectations should be tracked as product-risk prompts, especially around risk assessment, reporting, redress, transparency, algorithmic systems, children, and future user-to-user features. This page is not a legal compliance conclusion.