Correction And Enforcement Ladder

Editorial And Content Actions

For product-published or AI-assisted content, available actions are:

• No action, with rationale recorded.
• Private explanation to reporter where appropriate.
• Metadata or label correction.
• Source link correction.
• AI regeneration.
• Human rewrite.
• Added context note.
• Public correction note.
• Transparency-log entry.
• Removal or retraction from a public surface.
• Pause a prompt, model, source feed, or content class.
• Escalation to legal or senior review.

Appeal And Reconsideration

Material rejected correction requests can be reconsidered when the requester is affected, provides new evidence, identifies a material review error, or raises a serious public-interest concern.

Future User-Conduct Ladder

For future active user features, the launch prerequisite ladder should include no action, education or warning, comment or post removal, temporary feature restriction, account restriction, appeal, repeat-abuse escalation, and legal or safety escalation where required.

This future ladder is not a claim that Parliament People currently operates public user-content moderation.

Public Transparency

Material corrections, retractions, policy changes, source-ingestion issues, incidents, and appeal outcomes with public significance should be considered for the transparency log.