Sarah Sackman

Sarah Sackman

Lab

Backbencher (MP)

CommonsFinchley and Golders GreenCurrent Member

Affiliation

House: Commons

Constituency: Finchley and Golders Green

Status: Current member

Latest Activity

Sitting day: 2026-03-25

Activity total: 56

Contributions: 56

Votes recorded: 0

Current Offices

No current post data is attached to this profile.

Recent Votes

Recent recorded divisions

Recent Participation

Recent speeches in the feed

Back to feed

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:40

Q On your point about challenge, I do not think anyone in this room would dispute the importance of the right to protest. There is a difference where that breaks the law. The Gove…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:40

It is a good question. Can you answer it? Tim Crosland: I want to talk particularly about cases where people are saying—like Clive Ponting and many activists did—that the motivati…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:16

I would not disagree with that for one second.

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:16

Yes, you do provide services to victims. Emma Torr: We provide services to individuals who have been wrongfully convicted and unfairly sentenced. You could classify people like An…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:16

Q Is the same thing true for APPEAL? Emma Torr: Yes, but you have to understand that if you—

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:16

Q I do not want to hog the microphone, but I want to understand something about APPEAL and JUSTICE. We have had quite a lot of engagement, particularly with JUSTICE—there was a su…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:15

Thank you. Cassia Rowland: We are always banging the drum for more back office and admin staff at the IfG. I worry that some of these reform programmes will move productivity in t…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:14

Q There is no disagreement between us on the fact that we need to drive greater productivity and we want to get back to a higher target. I think where the disagreement comes is on…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:13

Q But not in anything like the numbers that we would need to address this issue. Cassia Rowland: No, it is not what you would need, but you also have to take it into account that…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:13

Q Do you agree with me, on that major productivity driver that we need to address, that it will take years before we see that productivity gain? Cassia Rowland: It does need to be…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:12

Q You have proposed that thesis, and I will come to that in a moment. You make the point about the disruption that might be caused by bringing in changes, but you also make the as…

Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)

2026-03-25 · 18:10

Q I, too, have questions for the IfG and I agree—thank you very much for both your reports, which are incredibly helpful. As you have just acknowledged and as you acknowledge on p…