Affiliation
House: Commons
Constituency: Bexhill and Battle
Status: Current member
Backbencher (MP)
Affiliation
House: Commons
Constituency: Bexhill and Battle
Status: Current member
Latest Activity
Sitting day: 2026-03-25
Activity total: 88
Contributions: 88
Votes recorded: 0
Current Offices
No current post data is attached to this profile.
Recent Votes
Recent recorded divisions
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 6
Commons - 2026-03-25T16:00:00+00:00
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 5
Commons - 2026-03-25T15:48:00+00:00
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 4
Commons - 2026-03-25T15:37:00+00:00
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 3
Commons - 2026-03-25T15:26:00+00:00
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 2
Commons - 2026-03-25T15:15:00+00:00
Victims and Courts Bill: motion to disagree with Lords Amendment 1
Commons - 2026-03-25T15:01:00+00:00
Opposition Day Motion: Defence
Commons - 2026-03-24T19:01:00+00:00
Opposition Day Motion: Oil and Gas
Commons - 2026-03-24T16:00:00+00:00
Recent Participation
Recent speeches in the feed
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:53Q Do you also agree that people who have the interests of victims at the heart of their thinking and positions on this can reasonably oppose your proposals, and that that does not…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:50Q I have asked you twice, and you have given the answer, and people can make up their own minds about what can be implied from that. Moving on to some extent, I can say to you, “T…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:48Q Sure, but do you think that people might be concerned that you cannot say that no one had any pressure applied to them? Sarah Sackman: What I know is that as a Minister, I seek,…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:48Q Okay, thank you for confirming what you did personally. But obviously other people would have been meeting these groups, so can you clearly answer this question: did anybody fro…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:46Q I want to start with a question that I raised with some of the earlier witnesses. It has been suggested that the Ministry in some way, through civil servants, Ministers or advis…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:10Great. Thank you very much; I appreciate that.
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 18:10Q Is it accurate to say that you reject the Government’s central assertion about the time saving? Cassia Rowland: There are a lot of uncertainties behind the modelling. Some of th…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 17:28Q Lord Burnett, when, as Lord Chief Justice, you were considering how to improve the efficiency of the service and the experience of victims, did you ever consider reductions to t…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 17:28Q You talk about a judge and two magistrates as something you favoured, and that is what Sir Brian recommended, but it is not what the Government are proposing. They are proposing…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 17:28Q The first example you have given is structural and not replicable across the whole country, but the other points you have made are all things we could support and implement more…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 17:26Q Very good. I want to pick up on your experience in Liverpool. I am sure you are familiar with this, and it has been discussed in Parliament, but the Liverpool Crown court does n…
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Second sitting)
2026-03-25 · 17:26Q My opening question for all three of you is this: what are the best and most positive features of jury trials, and how and why do we use them in our system? Lord Burnett of Mald…